Recent Posts | Share a Tip | Back to Basics | Reader Photos | Forum | Subscribe
Home Studio | Tutorials | Readers Projects
One of the basic rules of composition is the rule of thirds. This is a very basic rule, that is often ignored by amateurs, and can drastically improve your pictures. Here is how this rule works: imagine that you draw lines across your frame to form a tick-tack-toe playing board. (you should end up with nine identical squares). Now the image is divided to thirds, both horizontally and vertically. See the diagram for lines positions.
The Idea is to place important elements in the pictures where the lines intersect (the gray circles). Those intersections are also called golden sections, and the rule is also called The Golden Ratio Rule.
Lets look at this portrait. see how the girls face is at the top left intersection? (move the mouse over the image to see the golden section). The practice with the "thirds " rule is to place the eyes on the top line.
The rule of thirds also works for landscape pictures. In this picture, taken in Sinai, the land covers the lower third, while the sky (and mountains tips) cover the upper third. Move your mouse over the picture to reveal the thirds.
This rule is very effective when shooting sunsets (see the sunset photography guide). To work with this rule, you should place the horizon on the lower third line, and place the sun on one of the vertical lines.
Allot of times, you will find it easy to focus first, then compose. If you are using an old camera, that has only one focus point, at the middle of the frame, you can use the following method). place your subject in the middle of the frame, lightly press the shutter button to focus, then, without moving your finger, re-compose and complete the press.
Another interesting point is the relations between the sections. which section is the one that get most of the attention. since we usually scan from top to bottom, the two upper section points A and B are the ones we scan first. the order between them depends on the viewer language. English readers, for example, will scan point A first, since they read from left to right. Hebrew or Arabic speakers will scan point be first. So if you know who your viewers will be, and you can control composition to a great extent, make sure that your object is placed at the right side.
Comments
The Rule of Thirds vs. The Golden Ratio
The essence of your article has considerable merit however there is one error. Although the Rules of Thirds and the Golden Ratio are similiar they are not one and same. The Rule of Thirds has a ratio of 1 to .66667 whereas the Golden Rato is 1 to .61803. The Golden Ratio has been used in art and architecture since antiquity. Photographers like Steichen and Weston composed on the Golden Ratio and if you look at their work you will see that it is not on thirds. The four intersecting points on the Golden Ratio are closer to the center of the image than they are in the Rule of Thirds. A detailed description of The Golden Ratio and the Fibonacci Sequence of numbers on which the Golden Ratio is based is availabe on Wikipedia and other sites on the web.
the golden ratio is 1.6:1
the golden ratio is 1.6:1
the real figure is ..
for golden ratio is 1.6180339887 ....
it is equal to : 1 plus root of 5 all devided by 2 .
Both the same...
Just FYI -- you're ALL right. To say "Golden Ratio is 1 to .61803" is mathematically the same as saying it's 1:1.618. 1 divided by .61803 equals 1.618, so you're all right. It's just the latter is has better form than the former.
maths
arent maths great
Point to remember: Pie are
Point to remember: Pie are ROUND, not square. Yes, this thread is going downhill in a hurry...LOL
Wikiwaki
THere are much better explanations of the golden rectangle/ratio etc on the web than Wikipedia - why do people think that site is the ultimate repository of truth and wisdom? Often it's actually WRONG.
Anyway, back on topic. Thanks for writing this lovely explanation of the Rule of Thirds. It's clear that this is slightly different to the whole Golden Rectangle thing but it's along the same lines - and honestly - who can be bothered working out mathematical equations everytime they go to design a piece of art of take a photo? This is a very practical alternative based on the same idea - that's all.
How about editing the
How about editing the "wrong" stuff with proper citations then? Wikipedia is free to edit for a reason.
Post new comment