recent posts | submit an article | back to basics | subscribe | reader photos
home studio | tutorials | readers projects
Nick Wheeler, one of my all times Flickr favorites, just uploaded a new picture to DIYP pool. (And yes, it is the same Nick who brought you The DIY Strip Light and the Floor Lit Table Top Studio).
The posing on this picture is great, but the first eye catcher of this image is the Dave Hill post processing look it has.
If you don't know Dave Hill, please, sit back and treat yourself to an hour of fine photography. Dave is known for two things: You can not forget his portraits ones you've seen them - the visual impact is very strong. And you can not ignore his unique post processing look, what has become to be known as "The Dave Hill Look".
It looks like the web is all over Dave this month, as both the Stobist mail-tiviewed him and Scott Kelby gave a great tip on how to create a Dave Hill look in Lightroom.
I wanted to play a little and gave the Dave Hill look a try with a technique found in the Strobist threads. Thanks Omar for putting the thread together. (Click any of the images for bigger view)
This is what I started with - an image of my love one and her double-second-cousin.
The first thing is to duplicate the image layer (CTRL + J) and run a High Pass filter on the duplicated layer. Then choose 4.0 as filter radius. WOW! Don't be alarmed, we will fix this in a sec...
The next step is to select "vivid light" as the layer blending mode. Now flatten the layers (CTRL + SHIFT + E).
Again, duplicate the layer, and do a High Pass filter on the dup. This time select 6.9 as radius and color as blending mode.
Now choose layer opacity 40% and flattened again.
Now again - duplicate the layer. Now call on the Gaussian Blur (Filter-> Blur-> Gaussian Blur) filter and set it to 9.5. Still using the dup layer, call on the noise filter (Filter -> Noise -> Add Noise) and apply 3% noise.
OK, that looks really blurry, we will do something about it. Like remove all the blur from the eyes and ....
Now add a layer mask (Layer -> Add Layer Mask -> Hide All), and select the eyes using the lasso tool (L is the short cut for this). Now invert the selection (Shift + Control + I).
Now take the brush tool (B) set the opacity to 30% and paint over the entire image. TADA! Eyes are a bit sharper then the rest of the image. Flatten again.
The final step is to apply some unsharp mask filter (Filter -> Sharpen -> Unsharp Mask). Use the following values: Amount 100%, Radius 30.0 Pixels, Threshold 0. And ....
Make sure you don't miss out on the next article - Register to the RSS feed or the newsletter.
Other Things You Might Wanna Try:
- Super Simple Light Tent
- Flash Mounted homemade DIY Softbox
- Homemade Cheap Flash Diffuser
- The Origami Studio (An Extrapolation to The $0.02 Macro Studio)
Comments
Doesn't really work for me
To be honest this doesn't really work for me. The original picture with some more contrast and sharpening would be a much better result IMHO. Of course it could work for other pictures, but not in this case.
Fantastic. This is a great
Fantastic. This is a great tutorial. I really like this look. I look forward to trying it out with some of my portraits! Thank you!
LucisArt
Although this looks good and free, I don't think it tops LucisArt with some masking and additional local contrast enhancement for that style.
I just try and use it sparingly because this enhanced local contrast or "Lucis look" (which is more accurate to me than the "Dave Hill look") is becoming as big a fad as HDR has become. It does work beautifully for dramatic skies however.
Too sharp
I don't like it. I prefer the original portrait but I guess it's all subjective in the end isn't it? It looks like it's been over oversharpened.
Brilliant Tutorial
I have been wondering how to create this effect simply for ages without combining multiple exposures of the same shot.
I will give this a try and let you know what I think!
Action
And here can I download the action for this. ;)
halos
It's important when using this technique that you watch for darkening or lightening at high-contrast points in the photo (such as the shoulders of the girl in the pink shirt). using layer masks and just painting over these points to hide them will get rid of the dark halos, giving the image a less forced look.
Thanks to all
Jeroen, Donncha - Thanks, I too love the original. I was looking for a happy picture to convert, but as one of my friends said - Kids need no tricks. They have a character of their own. On second look it does look over sharpened. The original looks OK on my screen. I think it may has to do with Flickr auto processing.
Dan - LucisArt is looks nice, can you tell more about it. The site is not the most revealing one.
Peter- Darn halos. I wonder if it is flickrs auto sharpen thingy? the original looked ok on my screen.
Alaska, Giles - Thanks.
Awesome. I actually found
Awesome. I actually found the same steps from the flickr group.
A lot of purists will give flak because Dave Hill uses lighting to achieve his distinct look (he's said as much himself & for a few brewskis he'll divulge his secrets), but without the $$$ to spend on a lighting set up like his, this is a great way to emulate a similar look; I've gotten compliments from others (read:non-photographers) on my attempts at it.
Not in the editing.
I agree, its not in the editing, its in the lighting. Good tutorial though
Problem with this
Every time I try this, I get blown out highlights on the cheeks. I followed this tutorial EXACTLY. What could be the problem?
The problem is that
The problem is that depending on the size of the source image, the High-Pass filter will produce different results at different Radius settings.
For example, the Radius of this guy's image was 6.9, but that's relative to the number of pixels in HIS image. If you're working with a web resolution image, it might be more appropriate to use something like 1.5 on the Radius.
What's wrong with this entire post is that you can't do a few quick Photoshop tricks and end up with Dave Hill's style or quality. Dave is a pro. He has worked for a long time to perfect his technique and skills, and add to all that, he really knows his lighting equipment backward and forward, and he spends a lot of time working on each image in post production.
You can't expect to get his results with a Photoshop filter.
The Dave Hill "Problem"
Hi Dan,
I could not agree more. The ability to recreate David's look with photoshop is virtually non-existent. Dave is a lighting expert and a photography genius.
However it is possible to get a fraction of the look using Photoshop and this is what I try to do in this post. while results are not Dave Hill they are somwhat close to the look...
Much much much to sharp.
It's just so sharp.
I think the "enhancing" is just overboard.
The halos and drop shadow like effect behind the girls is bothersome and the effect seems kinda overdone. I think it just looks gaudy...
but!!!
That's just me.
As a photographer it's just a shaky subject because ever since photoshop and digital manipulation became more accessible to the masses I've seen some very distasteful "enhancements" popping up here and there.
Dave Hill Action dowload
is there a place on the we b that i can get this action without all the red tape
uuuuuuuuuuuuh no!
"is there a place on the we b that i can get this action without all the red tape"
No! lol
way, way too sharp, my man.
way, way too sharp, my man. too many halos
I guess there is no substitute for great lighting
I could not make it smoother, this is the price I had to pay when trading real lighting for Photoshop (poor) skills.
re:
Isnt this from "The Strobist" group on Flickr?? I saw this same exact tute there last year... is it yours?? great pic!!
yep, it's from the flickr discussion
I placed the link at the beginning of the article but here it is again.
The Strobist flickr threads are a valuable resource for every photographer. I can not stress the amount of learning I do there (as well as lots and lots of off topic interesting bits and pieces).
Big Photos required
guys ... these steps are made for VERY high quality pictures
try it of .... big sized pictures and things would look much better
sharp
this is a manip so one thing is certain. if u dont want i then dont use it. the manip's purpose is to increase image sharpness so stfu if u dont like it. btw. the tut is very effective since the image really did have a great/distinct outcome.
GREAT TOOL
If you guys would like to actions for this all you have to do is click record when you are going threw the steps. Done then you have a action tool you can use on any photo. My next photo I will be doing the same so that I will have this handy tool at my leisure. Awesome tutorial, Thanks a ton!!
I guess he copied that in Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/groups/strobist/discuss/72157594577686705/
Yes, clever mister
Yes, clever mister anonymous, he says in the article it is from the Flickr thread and he linked to the author's photostream, and to the Strobist thread twice.
I had been searching and
I had been searching and searching for the way to do this effect, and found it a couple of days ago. Then I see it here, lol. I guess it is a bit of a trend right now, but I don't really care, I love the look of it. I think it can only be used on certain pictures, though. I have to agree the choice of picture is happy, but the effect is dramatic and sometimes dark. I think it's best to use it sparingly.
Cool, but one extra step is needed
Great tutorial, but i think there is a final step missing.
One trademark of a Dave Hill image is the skin, it doesn't look gritty like in a HDR photo, it looks smooth and cartoony.
As a final step, i suggest applying a surface blur (Filter > blur > surface blur)
Radius between 7 and 10 and threshold between 12 and 15 dependant on the image.
One final note is that when you are thinking about attempting to recreate the Dave Hill Effect, taking separate shots is the key. The things about his work is that everything is in sharp focus which requires him to photograph each element individually. So one photo of your best mate will not work if the background is out of focus because your camera has auto focussed on the subject.
great tutorial none the less!
Nice tutorial but I think
Nice tutorial but I think Dave Hill is very much lighting orientated which gives this 'DH effect'.
re: lighting orientated
Alex, you are very much correct. This is just a poor man's photoshop hack. it is nice, if you dont have the setup (DH is using quite a lot of light), but far, far from the real thing.
Better way
Here is a better way of creating that effect, and just using LightRoom:
http://www.peteyphotography.com/?p=82
Post new comment