Recent Posts | Share a Tip | Back to Basics | Reader Photos | Forum | Subscribe
Home Studio | Tutorials | Readers Projects
They say a picture is worth a thousand words and a movie is worth a thousand pictures. But sometimes you want something in between, something that is as still as an image, yet conveys action like a film. This is an action sequence shot.
Sometimes the best way to achieve an effect is to do it in post. So this post will not involve any gear hacking (although I can think of some elaborate ways to make this with no post at all), but some good old post processing method.
An action sequence shot as a still image that is made from several frames. In the following tutorial Kaan Kiran demonstrates one method of making such action shot.
The guy in the picture is a close friend dancing for the Berlin Opera & Ballet. So he was the right person to shoot a sequence while he was kicking that turn from the boat to the water. In the image below you can see 3 of the 8 consecutive images that composed this sequence shot.
I personally did not like the landing much, but there was much to do about it.
I shot the whole sequence in raw. I must admit that I have just started to shoot Raw after seeing the crazy capabilities it has compared to jpegs. Since this scene is a hard one to reproduce, shooting in raw enable me to make some corrections after in post processing in case I wanted to fine tune white balance or other setting.
I used a Nikon D300 with a 10-20 sigma wide angle attached at focal length 10mm. Aperture: f8, shutter speed: 1/320. Manual Focus
I did not use a tripod. Even if I did, it would be totally pointless since I was standing on a rocky boat. But I made sure that my D300 is very still and not shaking a bit. Shutter speed was fast, so I was not worried from camera shake (the shutter speed rule of thumb allows going to 1/30 on the wide side of the lens, but settings were much faster).
There are eight frames in this picture in total. You may count seven, but there is actually a very bottom picture which I used for the background image. I used the pen tool in CS3 to extract the ballet's figure. Places where the jumper was surrounded by water could be extracted with lots of spare, as it would blend with the water. Places where jumper images overlayed were handled with more care. I then arranged the layers in the correct jumping order. Lastly, I aligned the figures to the background. At this point, my reference point was the line where the land meets the water.
You can see in the image below how stacking the images looks like with out any background.
After all layers were in order I used the blur tool in CS3, set the opacity level to 50 and went through all edges of all figures. This will make them blend much easily with the very bottom layer (background).
In the end, I merged all the layers and lowered the saturation a bit and added some vignetting on the edges of the whole frame.
I used a Wacom tablet working on this picture. I highly recommend it.
This article was contributed by Kaan Kiran - If you have not checked his Flickr stream, I encourage you to do so. It has some remarkable images.
Want to make sure you get more great articles? Register to the RSS feed or the newsletter.
Comments
cutting out subjects
Interesting you didn't use a tri-pod. I don't think I would have thought to try this without one. But, you're right, on a bouncing boat it doesn't matter.
My favorite method to separate a subject from its background is using "extract" (under filter) in photoshop. It works really well if you plan on blending with a new background.
Rosh
Choosing A Model And An Action Sequence
Really nice effect I like it a lot.
to get a really effective cut out and blending try using Fluid Mask 3 this is a really great standalone and plug in for cs2-3
I use it a lot for weddings and portraits really good for fine hair shots .
Barry John
Better tools probably exist for the job
I am in the middle of doing something similar with Hugin and Enblend. I will post the result and my findings as soon as I have time to finish it. (May take several days or more; I have a summer semester to finish)
I shot my sequence while panning the camera, following the figure, so I am going to end up with a panoramic image. The idea is to clear the background in the areas where the figure appears on other images, so the blending process will use only images which contain the figure for those areas. I still do not know exactly how I am going to select the areas for clearing, though.
better tools do exist for the job.
of course, but the easiest way to get from A to B is "the way" you actually know. thank you anyways.
I agree.
I agree with this. There *may* be better tools, but you'd spend an awful long time trying to find them, learn them, and produce something good with it.
Have to try this
Something I haven't done so far. Does not look to difficult. Have to try this. Thank you for the insparation!
layers with masks
Personally i would have used layers and masks, as they are all adjustable and there is no need to merge them all together in the end.

So have your base image and paint the other images into that using the masks.
e.g.
wow!!! that's really great,
wow!!! that's really great, I mean exactly what Ive seen in these pictures! that's what i need when making up dances! i think it hsould hepl me in my work, i hope it will work!
well done
i love the effect. thank you for sharing and happy holidays.
=)
Post new comment